Saturday, April 4, 2026

Thank You for Your Obedience


   











“Thank you for your service.”

We are all familiar with this expression and may use it ourselves when we learn that someone was in the military.  I can think of occasions in my life when it seemed like the right thing to say, and the examples in public life are countless. 


Almost certainly, the ever-present risk of losing one’s life in the course of fulfilling one’s responsibilities in the profession is what lies behind the expression of gratitude. It also may involve a recognition of the moral and emotional price paid by those who take lives in the name of our country.

 I have personally never heard the saying applied to teachers, nurses, physical therapists, home health attendants or others whose service does not involve taking or risking of life.

This saying seems to have grown along with the development of a volunteer, as opposed to conscript, military since the end of the Draft in 1973. No longer are all of us, and our children, required by law to be in a situation of losing or taking life.

Even so, misunderstandings regarding military service may occur and that is why I am offering a slight modification, an alternative which would be both more accurate, namely:


“Thank you for your obedience.”

The distinguishing characteristic of service in any military organization is obedience to orders handed down through the chain-of-command. In past decades of US history, we have thanked our veterans for their obedience to orders in such conflicts as Viet Nam, Iraq, Afghanistan, Grenada, Venezuela, Panama etc. even when we disagreed with the justifications offered by civilian leaders for such wars. The fact that a limited number of men and women swore an oath, put on a uniform and risked their lives in these wars is what we honored. 

When US military personnel were ordered to send a Tomahawk missile smashing down onto a girls school in Minab, Iran on February 28, no one would expect them to tell their commander to think twice or to check the coordinates more closely. When Air Force or Navy personnel were ordered by Trump to blow fishing boats out of the Caribbean, killing over a hundred people, we hardly expected them to ask for evidence that the boats were legitimate targets. 

Even in matters of policy, high-ranking military personnel are expected to obey without public questioning of the orders from civilian leadership. Joint Chiefs Chairman Caine reputedly warned against Trump’s attack on Iran, but he has not expressed his reservations in public. Army Chief of Staff Randy George has obediently accepted dismissal and early retirement from Pete Hegseth. In his case, the policy difference is said to be that General George did not support Hegseth’s vision of an all-white officer corps.

According to the Uniform Code of Military Justice, obedience has its limits, as was pointed out by Senators Elissa Slotkin and Mark Kelly and their veteran/colleagues in a well-publicized video earlier this year.  They reminded serving military of the requirement under the Code to disobey illegal orders. This was clearly a wise and necessary statement, as evidenced by the furious and futile response of the Trump regime. 

However, according to Google, the only recorded example of US troops refusing an illegal order was in 1968 at My Lai, Viet Nam when a few soldiers refused to obey orders to massacre innocent villagers.

Obedience is the norm and in 2026 that means obedience to the homicidal whims of one old man. This is why I respectfully suggest this new phrase with which to recognize and sympathize with those now serving in his undeclared and unauthorized wars against Iran, Gaza, Lebanon, Yemen, and perhaps Cuba, Canada, Greenland...


Cross published at Daily Kos and Substack

Friday, August 1, 2025

Maps Were Not Needed

 

A new poem has been published in the summer 2025 edition of Thimble Literary Magazine.

I wrote the first draft of this poem in a writing workshop at Battery Park City library facilitated by Jon Curley - a wonderful and supportive group I hope to join again in the coming year.


MAPS WERE NOT NEEDED 

Maps were not needed to discover where we were.
The man who was speaking said he was a poet.

The very old woman mistrusted wind chimes.
When she spoke of dragons and angels, we applauded.

The laboratory test displayed numbers and letters I could not
         understand.
I drank large quantities of water and read my own notes.

In the darkness two faces appeared to be one.
In my arms you said that nothing could happen.

At other times you were simply present.
You had never gone away.

Share!











Monday, June 3, 2024

Poems published in Jarfly Magazine

 Two poems which I began many years ago have finally found a home in the Spring issue of Jarfly Magazine. (Alas, this journal went out of business in 2025)




"St. Paul’s Churchyard" is set in the colonial era graveyard of St. Paul’s Chapel, across the street from the World Trade Center site. The first version of the poem was written in the churchyard some time before 9/11.

“Fearing the Mist Near Lumberville” was inspired by a solitary walk along a country road near Lumberville, Pennsylvania. The first version of this poem was probably begun even earlier, perhaps around 1993.




Thursday, April 25, 2024

Poems published in April and May, 2024

 

The Very Next Season

The woman asked me if I could move out of her way.
A variety of people came into the subway car.

Some were overly friendly. Others were insane.
I looked around for someone that I knew.

It was then I discovered that some of my friends had grown very old.
I quickly changed trains at DeKalb and rode all the way to Coney Island.

I walked past the frozen Ferris wheel out onto the beach.
The winter rains reminded me that the very next season was Spring.

 

Eunoia Review


You removed, Barbara

the dark jacket
of your possibility

and stepped so precisely
through the tangled clothes on the bedroom floor

that I arrived alone
in the places that you treasured


Two Folding Chairs

I want to set up two folding chairs in this place

and drink vodka and tonic with you until it gets so dark

that I can’t find my way home past the gravestones of all
the other lovers who, side by side, are buried here  

                                               

Saturday, November 11, 2023

Five poems published recently in Literary Magazines

 


Three poems are appearing in the current issue of HeartWood Literary Magazine from West Virginia Wesleyan College




THE NEW APARTMENT

We had no trouble finding it.
The door was unlocked so we walked right in.

The outdoor staircase was beautiful.
We both loved the view of the Hudson River.

You would be busy with something else in the morning.
I took care of all the paperwork.

Even after I was awake for a long time, I did not stop to think
that we had decided on this apartment in a dream.

I HESITATED BEFORE THE MYSTERY OF YOUR ABSENCE

There was no warning in the mirror.

The world had halted.

Alexander’s famous horse began to dance.

My hands were full of grapes. Servants surrounded

me, carrying platters of snow from the Caucasus.

Alarm bells rang, gendarmes came running. The hour

was late. I lit a cigarette. You appeared before my eyes.

 

FOUNDATION

you almost choked on that wild golden

apple we found on a tree next to a field

growing out of the foundation of what

had once been a farmhouse overlooking a valley

a hundred and fifty miles from here

 

—MICHAEL COONEY









as we traveled north

We talked to people from various states.

We looked for rest stops with convenient bathrooms.

I picked up take-out for the motel.

I carried your oxygen concentrator out to the car.

We crossed into Georgia and South Carolina.

Last year we went up into the Smoky Mountains.

You were feeling much better, and we saw bears.

Our favorite café was closed.

The radiation seemed like nothing after the chemo.

The top of the mountain was beautiful.

Your hair had grown back.

We returned to the hotel overlooking the town.

In October we went to the coast and ate oysters.

You really liked apple martinis.

I don’t think you ever had the fish tacos.

I do not want to talk to anyone

or go anywhere without you






from Hidden Peak Press in Colorado


At the Waterfall

To what extent this will shorten my life is a question
I will not ask. I do not want an answer.
People get older. People forget. People die.
The calendar dictates, you could say, all things.

The waterfall that we visited in the morning
when you were nineteen was not Niagara.
We sat down beside it. Your head was in my lap.
Do you see that girl? She has your eyes.

— MICHAEL COONEY

Monday, May 29, 2023

A poem and an essay inspired by Simone Weil

  

Psalm for Simone Weil

From the highest heaven God throws a rope. Man either grasps it or not.
-	From the New York Notebooks of Simone Weil

Sir, what is humanity
that you pay such attention to us,
or men and women
that you let us love one another?

Words slide from you, dropping down
to where you stride
over glaciers and rocks
and down the icy walks of the sea,

trailing behind you a rope, my Friend,
that we can grasp
or at our choosing,
cast away.


My poem “Psalm for Simone Weil,”  written 20 years ago, is finally appearing in print in the current issue of Amethyst Magazine, which leads me to think that this might be a good time to re-publish the following essay which I originally wrote for the defunct Street Prophets site back in 2011. At a time when narrow-minded religious fanaticism is doing so much damage to our society in the form of recent Supreme Court rulings on women's freedom of choice, racial equality, and the human right to love, we need to remember this neglected French philosopher. Unlike the rigid Roman Catholicism of the Supreme Court majority of Alito, Robert, Thomas, Barrett, and Kavanaugh, she appreciated the beauty of the Catholic faith while remaining outside all formal creeds....


Simone Weil and the Primacy of Attention


Albert Camus called her "the only great spirit of our time" but she was certainly not what most people would call a happy or well-adjusted person.  She was almost certainly anorexic and her death at 34 was probably due as much to self-starvation as tuberculosis.  In 1930s Europe she was in the midst of radical movements, yet she was never really a part of them. As the Holocaust descended over Europe, she scribbled letters and notes, unable to strike effectively against the Nazis. As far as anyone knows, she never had an intimate relationship, emotional or physical, with any man or woman.  And for all her intense intellectuality, all of her books are posthumous, based on her journals and letters.

But it was Simone Weil who said this about human happiness:

Those who are unhappy have no need for anything in this world but people capable of giving them their attention

.

For her, the entire meaning of life was centered in that single concept of attention. "Looking is what saves us," she wrote. "Attention is the sincerest form of generosity." In our media-saturated culture when there so are so many competing claims on our attention , from the outright false and trivial to the most vital, it is worth recalling the singular importance of this virtue.

Born into a secular Jewish family, steeped in the classics and in philosophy, and fascinated by the Catholic Church, she saw no enduring value in any doctrine:

A doctrine serves no purpose in itself, but it is indispensable to have one if only to avoid being deceived by false doctrines. 


Instead of any particular religion or philosophy, what animated this isolated woman was compassion for the oppressed:


Human beings are so made that the ones who do the crushing feel nothing; it is the person crushed who feels what is happening. Unless one has placed oneself on the side of the oppressed, to feel with them, one cannot understand.


She grew up in a supportive and politically radical family, and at the age of ten she informed her parents that she was she was a Bolshevik and would be reading the communist newspapers.  Her parents were sympathetic to the exiled Leon Trotsky and hosted a meeting for him in their Paris apartment in 1930, where young Simone engaged him in fierce debate. She was incapable, however, of surrendering her independent judgment to any ideology and by the time she was in the university, she wrote papers sharply critical of Marxist theory.

Nonetheless she continued to oppose capitalist systems of production, not so much because the elite own the means of production but because another more fundamental conflict had been added, "by the very means of production, between those who have the machine at their disposal and those who are at the disposal of the machine."


Her classmate Simone de Beauvoir describes the young Simone in her own memoirs:

She intrigued me because of her great reputation for intelligence and her bizarre get-up. A great famine had broken out in China, and I was told that when she heard the news she had wept: these tears compelled my respect much more than her gifts as a philosopher. I envied her having a heart that could beat right across the world. I managed to get near her one day. I don't know how the conversation got started; she declared in no uncertain tones that only one thing mattered in the world: the revolution which would feed all the starving people of the earth. I retorted, no less peremptorily, that the problem was not to make men happy, but to find the reason for their existence. She looked me up and down: 'It's easy to see you've never been hungry,' she snapped.

Another idiosyncrasy setting Simone apart from the radicals of her time was her publicly announced decision to live a celibate life as part of her commitment to the working class struggle, prompting her fellow students to call her "the Red Virgin."


It is not surprising that Simone's career as a secondary school teacher quickly led to dismissal from her first and second jobs as she set out to radicalize her students and to organize unemployed workers. And it didn't help that even her best students failed to pass the rigorous national exams.  When a teaching career became impossible, she took a job as a piece worker in a Renault factory with the goal of organizing the workers. Due to her poor manual dexterity, this career also was unsuccessful.


In1937 she left for Spain to join the anarchist army fighting Franco's fascists.Simone was not much of a soldier, however, and failed even at target practice. After an injury involving a cooking pot and boiling oil, she returned to France just before her entire unit was massacred.  

Coming back from Spain, she was probably severely depressed. And it was at this point that after months of inward darkness, she became very conscious of a personal God. "We do not have to search for Him," she wrote in her journal. "We only have to change the direction in which we are looking."

She experienced a divine comforter beyond doctrine and dogma: "He cannot refuse to come to those who implore him long, often and ardently." And "if we agree to his entry, he comes. As soon as we cease to want Him, He vanishes."

Simone saw no contradiction between this loving God and atheism: "An atheist may be simply one whose faith and love are concentrated on the impersonal aspects of God." And she seemed to think that the soul did not outlast the body.

Her association with Roman Catholicism grew out of a friendship with the priest Joseph-Marie Perrin.  That personal relationship may be why she turned toward Catholicism, rather than seeking out equally rich spiritual traditions within Judaism, in an effort to explain her experience of God.  One might think that the close association between fascists and Catholic hierarchy, notably under Franco, would have made the Church unappealing to her, but evidently she was able to separate her personal experience of the divine from any feelings about the institution.

Simone began to attend Catholic services but resisted all urging from Father Perrin to actually convert and accept baptism. In her notebooks she reveals the extent to which this turn toward religious faith was rooted in a self-abnegation perhaps akin to anorexia:

Weil wanted nothing so much as to lose herself altogether: "May God grant that I become nothing,"  she wrote in a notebook entry that would later be included in Gravity and Grace. "We must become nothing, we must go down to the vegetative level; it is then that God becomes bread."



In 1942 she fled to the US with her parents to escape the Nazis but was soon back in England where she offered her services to DeGaulle's Free French. Her proposal to organize a unit of nurses who would parachute into France to aid the resistance went nowhere. And as she insisted on limiting her own food intake to the same rations allotted to those in occupied France, she contracted tuberculosis and died in 1943.

The narrative of her short life certainly seems, on its surface, a tale of neurosis and failure. And yet her intense and very private writings reveal a rich inner life that is fascinating for anyone interested in the nexus of spiritual exploration, personal psychology, and political activism.


For me,  the most intriguing aspect of her thought is her concept of attention, which she emphasized almost to the point of downplaying the need for action. By her lights, people need attention second only to food. (And one cannot help but wonder how large a part attention or the lack of it played in her own life.)

She must have been talking about something beyond what most of us mean by this common word, some recognition of an inner godhead perhaps: "The capacity to give one's attention to a sufferer is a very rare and difficult thing; it is almost a miracle; it is a miracle."


And in a time when a debate over mere numbers obsesses our politics and media, she reminds us that:

The needs of a single human being are sacred. Their satisfaction cannot be subordinated either to reasons of state, or to any consideration of money, nationality, race, or color, or to the moral or other value attributed to the human being in question, or to any consideration whatsoever.

 

She never lost the anarchist's distrust of power and she was very aware of how effective brute force is in destroying human potential, as is happening this very moment throughout the world:

Who were the fools who spread the story that brute force cannot kill ideas? Nothing is easier. And once they are dead they are no more than corpses.

  

and


When once a certain class of people has been placed by the temporal and spiritual authorities outside the ranks of those whose life has value, then nothing comes more naturally to men than murder.


She is, to be sure, a troubling figure, so well-intentioned and yet ultimately so self-destructive. If you are interested in exploring her thoughts further, my experience is that her essays collected in Waiting for God (1950) are a good starting point.

 

Sunday, May 28, 2023

"353 West 57" is published in Drunk Monkeys magazine


 







an excerpt from the 2022 story of a radical woman who disappeared in 1937..... Now online in Drunk Monkeys latest issue

I was standing there taking pictures with my iPhone when I heard a kind of moaning sound. Turning my head, I saw a woman holding her hands to her face. When she lowered her arms and I could see her face, I felt a huge shock. There wasn’t a doubt in my mind. I had seen pictures of her on the internet.

I immediately recalled the words with which Whittaker Chambers, my go-to author for that era, had described her: “a heavy-set, dark, softly feminine woman in her late forties.”

 “Juliet?” I said. “Miss Poyntz?”  

“Are you…” she started to say. “What has…I mean to say…who?”

I stared into her terrified eyes and pronounced the name of the man whom Tresca said had lured her out of the tiny room where she had hidden for weeks: “Schachno Epstein.”

A smile appeared and vanished. “Who? Why isn’t he here? Has something happened to him?”

“He’s fine,” I assured her. It was obvious to me that some kind of time warp had occurred. In the course of my extensive historical research, I had come to believe that such things were possible.

If this woman was indeed waiting for her onetime lover, Schachno Epstein, who could she be but Juliet Poyntz? Who else would even recognize the name of the totally forgotten Epstein, who had shuttled back and forth between Russia and the U.S. under a variety of names, doing the dirtiest of work for Stalin, setting up other people for the kill, never pulling the trigger himself? 


and who was this mysterious person? Whittaker Chambers, the onetime communist agent turned informer for the McCarthy Committee, says this about Juliet Poyntz, who was last seen in June 1937 in a Women's Hotel at 353 West 57th Street in New York City:


"She was living in a New York hotel. One evening she left her room with the light burning and a page of unfinished handwriting on the table. She was never seen again. It is known that she went to meet a Communist friend in Central Park and that he had decoyed her there as part of a G.P.U. trap. She was pushed into an automobile and two men drove her off.

                                                                                    - Whittaker Chambers, Witness  (1952):






For more on the historical record of her disappearance and almost certain murder, see my sources at:  The Disappearance of Juliet Poyntz in 1937


Also of interest is the recent study of the Poyntz case and its political uses by historian Denise Lynn, reviewed here:     Who Was Juliet Poyntz?